The New Boss

When Stalin suffered a fatal brain injury that led to his death in early March of 1953, it set off a bloody struggle of control that would drastically shift attitudes in a new direction for both the government and the country. Stalin’s death is extremely ironic when Stalin needed help the most, the complicated bureaucracy that he created prevented him from getting any, and the purges that he had carried out stopped the proper doctors from providing the necessary care.   Once the glorious leader finally died that’s when the real struggle began.  The death created a tremendous vacuum in Soviet leadership. Stalin had ruled the Soviet Union since the 1920s. With his passing, the heir was Georgi Malenkov, who was named premier and first secretary of the Communist Party the day after Stalin died. His position mainly held control of the party, but he happened to share power with two other people Lavrentii Beria and Nikita Khrushchev However, it wouldn’t be long before Malenkov resigned due to PR scandal, and Nikita Khrushchev assumed his role. You can actually see three men carrying Stalin’s casket during the funeral procession (Pictured Below).

Manezh Square, Moscow

(Stalin’s Funeral from The Manhoff Archives)


Out of the remaining competitors, Khrushchev’s biggest threat was Beria who was the Head of the Interior and the secret police, which held a lot of power. To gain the favor of the people, Beria very cunningly, took on the role of Liberal reformer. He spoke about protecting civil rights, he even released political prisoners and challenged many of Stalin’s acts, including the doctors’ plot.


(Lavrentii Beria)

Feeling threatened by Beria’s rising popularity amount the people, and fearing for his own life, Khrushchev began to engineer his downfall.  Khrushchev conspired with Malenkov and several other presidium members to arrange for Beria’s arrest at the hands of the military. The plot was sprung on Beria on June 26, 1953.  Khrushchev first launched a blistering attack on Beria, accusing him of being a cynical careerist, and no real Communist believer.  The veteran Molotov and others chimed in against Beria, and Khrushchev put a motion for his instant dismissal. Before a vote could be taken, the panicky Malenkov pressed a button on his desk as the pre-arranged signal to Marshal Zhukov and a group of armed officers in a nearby room. They immediately burst in, seized Beria and manhandled him away. Pravda announced Beria’s fall on July 10th, crediting it to the initiative of Comrade Malenkov and referring to Beria’s ‘ criminal activities against the Party and the State.’  A special tribunal was set up. The accused were allowed no representation and no appeal. “When the death sentence was passed, according to General Moskalenko, Beria fell to the floor and begged on his knees for mercy. It was not a quality he had shown to others, and it was not now shown to him. He and his confederates were taken away and promptly shot.” ( *WARNING!* The video contains vulgar language and violence but gives a dramatized view of what the trial may have looked like, from “The Death of Stalin.”)


(Khrushchev happily looking at corn)

However, while Beria was being trialed and overthrown, Malenkov as head of the state apparatus launched what he called a “New Course.” Which stressed consumer goods production, a shift in policy that was considerably more radical than what Khrushchev was proposing   Malenkov also pushed through an important initiative in collective farm policy which resulted in reduced tax payments by peasants of up to fifty percent. Now even though Malenkov had lost the critical position of First Secretary, these changes still presented a threat, so Khrushchev had to get rid of him once and for all. In the end, Khrushchev forged alliances with important party figures such as Anastas Mikoian and Nikolai Bulganin as well as Marshal Georgii Zhukov, the new Defense Minister, strengthened his position to the point where Malenkov became isolated and was forced to resign as prime minister on February 8, 1955. They replaced him with a Khrushchev puppet, Nikolai Bulganin. In March 1958, Khrushchev consolidated his power by taking the office of premier himself. Khrushchev won the battle over Stalin’s succession by reviving the party apparatus and reasserting its control over the government.

Work Cited:

Freeze, Gregory L. “From Stalinism to Stagnation 1953-1985.” Russia a History. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 409-416. Print.

Siegelbaum, Lewis. “Succession to Stalin.” Soviet history, Accessed 31 March 2018


10 thoughts on “The New Boss

  1. Great work explaining all the confusion around the succession of Stalin! I think it’s interesting how many of Beria’s works were used against him as “anti-Communist,” and his arrest shows Khrushchev’s cunning political maneuvering.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. That’s really interesting that Beria being accused of focusing on his career and work was considered anti-Communist. With the whole point of Communism being that everyone works together for the betterment of society as a whole, it seems like a pretty flimsy excuse for calling him an anti-Communist.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I agree; I believe they were just so scared by his power and access to private knowledge that they were just coming up with any reason to get rid of him. If you watched the clip from “Death of Stalin” it mentions how he had multiple sexual misdeeds, to say the least, and I think that was what the real crime was.


      1. Agree that the others feared Beria — a LOT….and not just because of his personal bloodthirstiness and the lascivious nature of some of his crimes (which can be documented in more reliable sources than the Death of Stalin movie (entertaining as it is!!). As the head of the security apparatus, which had carried out most of the repressions, Beria led the agency most closely tied to the crimes of the Stalin era. He had to go.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. I didn’t realize that thank you, Yes, Beria being the Head of the Secret Police was well versed in the art of manipulation, and used that to his advantage, probably one of the reasons they had him killed.


  3. I really enjoyed how you discussed Beria in your post. I found it really interesting that they focused on presenting Beria as anti-Communist and anti-state despite the fact that he had been loyal for years under Stalin doing the dirtiest of work in the name of the state.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. This was a great post – I never realized the various aspects in this transition of power. I enjoy how in-depth you went with your analysis of the various events that allowed Stalin’s successors to take power. Keep up the great work!


  5. Dalton Ragland

    Very informative overview on the effect Stalin’s death had on the political leadership situation in he Soviet Union. It seems many of the other leaders were influenced by Stalin’s manipulative schemes and showed that they had the ability to come up with their own. Do you think that this frantic grab for power helped lead to the political instability later on in the Soviet Union?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s